Our products regularly undergo independent third-party verification of security, privacy, and compliance controls. To assist in your compliance with global regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation GDPRwe share up-to-date information, best practicesand easy access to documentation.
In addition, Google Cloud offers data privacy, data portability, and threat protection products and features that can support your compliance efforts.
These can be leveraged to prevent abuse or unlawful access to your data and maintain the ongoing confidentiality, integrity, and availability of your data, and satisfy other requirements. You own your data.
We do not access your data for any reason other than those necessary to fulfill our contractual obligations to you. With Access Transparencywe capture real-time logs of manual, targeted accesses by either support or engineering, so you can have visibility into our actions. It also allows you to perform regular audits of access by administrators as a check on the effectiveness of our controls.
Our Google Cloud Trust Principles summarize our commitment to protecting the privacy of your data, and if you choose to stop using Google Cloud, you can take your data with you at any time.
Cloud Services по Русский, перевод, Английский-Русский Словарь
Get your complimentary copy of the report. Google Cloud offers a breadth of products and technologies designed to protect your data throughout its lifecycle. Google Cloud GCP data security and governance Google Cloud Platform GCP offers industry-leading tools and technology to efficiently protect and govern your data throughout its lifecycle. Protection Management Compliance Transparency.
Built-in data protection at scale GCP offers built-in data protection at scale to help protect your business from intrusions, theft, and attacks. Efficiently manage data GCP provides industry-leading tools and technology to efficiently manage data throughout its lifecycle.
Support compliance requirements Our products regularly undergo independent third-party verification of security, privacy, and compliance controls. Creating trust through transparency You own your data. Get the report. Technology and tools Google Cloud offers a breadth of products and technologies designed to protect your data throughout its lifecycle. Data lifecycle management Encryption by default in transit and at rest Encryption protects your data from system compromise or data exfiltration while in transit or at rest.
Manage cryptographic keys for your cloud services the same way you do on-premises. Cloud Hosting: Accounting for the security impact of hosting in the cloud. Microsoft Research. Security for the cloud infrastructure: RFC Department of Computer Science.
Безопасность информационных технологий ISSN: It follows from equation 2 that the quick reaction to the changes provide a significant impact to the organization, but after a while, the potential of IT service change is exhausted.
This may mean that users found alternative way of action under the new conditions, for example, they acquired the IT tools from third-party, without the consent of the IT department, or developed own applications based on spreadsheets and etc. Equation 2 can be used as a basis for comparison of the intangible benefits of different options of sourcing IT services.
Suppose that the expected values of reaction time of the two alternatives Ak and Ai are Tk and tj respectively.
Therefore, relative performance of alternatives under flexibility criterion is:. So exponential scale should be used for comparing the alternatives and relative performance of alternative is defined by reduction of reaction time, which it promises. These data. To develop a method for evaluating the potential risks of various alternatives, we will use the seminal model of Gordon and Loeb  with additions made Matsuura .Security Threats and Solutions of Cloud Computing
Let us consider a one-period economic model of a firm contemplating the additional security efforts to protect a given information set. The information set is characterized by the following three parameters:.
GCP data security and governance
Let S z, v denote the probability that an information set with vulnerability v will be breached, conditional on the realization of a threat and given that the firm has made an information security investment of z to protect that information. That is:. Matsuura  noted that the information security investment z can reduce the threat probability and that the reduction depends only on the investment z and the current level of threat probability Q.
So let T z, t denote the probability that a threat occurring, given that the firm has made an investment of z. So in his extended model:. Equation 3 can be used as a basis for quantitative comparison of risks of various alternatives.
Suppose that the expected values of threat and vulnerability of the two alternatives Ak and Ai are vktk and viti respectively. Therefore, relative performance of alternatives is:. Lower value of vjtj corresponds to the more attractive alternative, therefore, in order to go to the maximization problem, we should consider the reciprocal values under risk criterion.
Linear scale should be used for comparing the alternatives under risk criterion. In case of relative importance of criteria comparison, it is necessary to take in consideration a requirement of normality:. Therefore, following simple procedure can be used in practice. The first step is to assign weights Wj and Wj to two random criteria Cj and Cj based on their relative importance. Absolute values of alternatives in terms of each criterion were estimated by experts.
In accordance with rules proposed in Section 3, the entries of S, F and R can be calculated as follows:. In accordance with Section 3. Let use weighted production model WPM to define relative attractiveness of alternatives. WPM is one of best known and simplest MCDM method for evaluating number of alternatives in terms of a number decision criteria.
Suppose that a given MCDM problem is defined on m alternatives and n decision criteria, and all the criteria are benefit criteria, that is, the higher the values are, the better it is. Let Wj denotes the relative weight of importance of the criterion Cj and ajki is the relative performance value of alternative Ak regarding alternative Aj when they are evaluated in terms of criterion Cj.
So, to compare the two alternatives Ak and Aj the following product has to be calculated :. With given C, S, F and R: Therefore, with given criteria priorities and parameters estimations the best alternative is A2, because it is superior to all the other alternatives. The ranking of alternatives is as follows: The main goal of paper is to propose simple model that can be used in practice.
Безопасность информационных технологий
Three criteria cost of ownerships saving, intangible benefits that associated with speed of reaction to change and security risks that have been proposed here are enough simple and all necessary data can be obtained from accounting system, contract conditions, statistics and expert opinions. The proposed method helps easy to get a consistent matrix of pairwise comparisons. All of this leads to the conclusion that the proposed method can be used in practice.
Marston S. Cloud Computing: The Business Perspective.
Decision Support Systems. Armbrust M. A View of Cloud Computing. Communications of the ACM. Karunakaran S.
Business View of Cloud: Management Research Review. Yang H. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. Paper 2. Tak B. To Move or not to Move: The Economics of Cloud Computing. Khajeh-Hosseini A.
The Cloud Adoption Toolkit: Supporting Cloud Adoption Decisions in the Enterprise. Practice and Experience. Misra S. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. Advanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology. Springer, Garg S. Future Generation Computer Systems. Sundarraj R. Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation. Delone W. A Ten-Year Update. Journal of management information systems. Takabi H. Catteddu D.
Benefits, Risks and Recommendations for Information Security. ENISA, Subashini S. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. Hashizume K. Journal of Internet Services and Applications. Angeles S. Business News Daily, Grimes R. InfoWorld, Martens B. Decision-Making in Cloud Computing Environments: A Cost and Risk Based Approach. Information Systems Frontiers. Kantarcioglu M.
IEEE, Saripalli P. Savage S.